Tuesday, September 8, 2015

Week 3 (J2, Bruek, O'Byrne)

This week's readings have me thinking about literacy tools in new ways. Both the TPACK and the IRT models of incorporating technology into everyday instruction show us that the purpose of using new literacies is to deepen student knowledge of content. The seamless merging of content, technology, and pedagogy seem like common sense as I think about use of new literacies in my classroom (they are meant to deepen content knowledge - duh!). But when I began thinking about the reality of how we use technology in my school building, I realized that what seems to be so simple and straightforward is not happening in classrooms at all. Instead, teachers are using laptop carts and iPads to almost just "entertain" students because they are simply playing games and using interactive gaming websites to practice skills. Content is not being thought of as a guiding force for using the technology in the first place. It's almost as if students are just getting play time, so that the teacher can work with small groups or assess a group of students, which I understand the need for, but then the technology is not being used to deepen any content knowledge at all. Do you guys see this in your buildings as well? Or are teachers using technology in ways that either assess, or build upon content knowledge? Does it look different at the secondary level, Angela?

One program my school used to utilize, and that almost served as a middle ground between what I see teachers doing in my building and the IRT model, was tickettoread.com. One this website, students were reading stories and assessed on comprehension strategies to build their 'club house'. The students loved how interactive it was, and teachers loved that students were deepening their comprehension through practicing on digital devices. We were able to teach them to highlight text and search new vocabulary words, also. It wasn't the perfect program, but it served a great purpose if used in the right way. We were so sad when our administration decided not to buy licenses for our building again! Something else that I have downloaded onto my phone that can be used to practice comprehension skills is the app called Epic! On this app on my iPhone, I can download books from the Epic! library for students to read on my device. Each book has a GE reading level, lexile level, and most of them even have AR quizzes for them (another program my school utilizes). I allow certain students to use my phone to read in the hallways during bathroom breaks, etc. and they absolutely love it! This isn't following a TPACK or IRT model of integration, but it does provide good practice for my kiddos. Has anyone taught or used the TPACK model to integrate technology into their classrooms, for the purposes of deepening student knowledge? How so?

In the Bruek and O'Byrne articles, I found the idea of the open learning network very interesting, too! It seems to get pretty tricky when thinking through sharing licenses and things, but it made me think of the way so many teachers use teacherspayteachers.com to reuse and reinvent things for their classrooms. I know this isn't a way to share strategies and experiences with other educators, but this is the closest thing I know that related to what the articles were saying. Has anyone had experience with Open Education Resources that support access to knowledge for teachers and students?

10 comments:

  1. 1. Many teachers in my building use websites such as abcya or starfall during whole group or centers to practice basic skills such as letter recognition, letter sound relationships, number recognition, and counting. I think this can be a good thing because it engages students, but I also think that most young children are more in need of hands-on, real-life experiences to develop basic skills.

    2. I have use technology in the past as a tool for research in inquiry-based projects. This allows students to practice skills such as reading fluency, comprehension, and writing. It also builds their background knowledge of specialized subjects such as science and social studies. Lastly, it gives students an opportunity to practice using digital reading to gather information.
    3. Does Pinterest count as an Open Education Resource? It links to lesson plans and materials, provides visual aides for planning, and connects teachers.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Good point about Pinterest - I don't think it counts as an OER specifically, but I know that the blog links connect teachers and they are able to discuss how they use resources, etc in their classrooms. I'm interested to know how a legitimate OER, like the one he was a part of in the article, works!

      Delete
    2. vlc.uchicago.edu Everyday Math Virtual Learning Community

      Do you think this would count? It is not literacy unfortunately, but it has an area where teachers can view/share math resources, discussion groups for different grade levels/topics, and videos of lessons for pd.

      Delete
    3. I feel like the Everyday Math VLC could count as an OER! Teachers are able to contribute as well as use the resources, which at least takes care of the "open" part. I'd be willing to bet there are similar websites specific to literacy. Does anybody know of any? Would Scholastic count?

      Delete
    4. I would say that that EDM Virtual Learning community definitely counts! There are awesome webinars and everything to support the EDM curriculum and learning. I don't know of many for literacy specifically, actually...anyone else? I know of some resources for the Treasures curriculum, but they're strictly resources and supports.

      Delete
    5. Girls I love this conversation about OERs! I was curious and found this on Edutopia. http://www.edutopia.org/open-educational-resources-guide It talks more about the importance of Open Education and I found it helpful!

      Delete
  2. You make a very good point about how teachers are implementing technology as entertainment rather than a medium to enhance students' learning of content. Technology should be used as a facilitative tool rather than a reward or distraction for students. That sounds obvious, but it really is a struggle for teachers. That's why I liked the charts in J2 discussing the different hardware and software that teachers can use for instructional purposes--it's not just games on an iPad. Students should be creating, interpreting, evaluating, and researching when they use technology, just like they should be when they are engaging in technology-free learning.

    I think that TPACK and CLF are great ways to help teachers plan technology use, but I think it could be overwhelming for some. Perhaps it could be more beneficial for teachers to consider just one or two CLF elements and use that as a foundation for each of their lessons that include technology. What do you think? How can we practically help teachers use those frameworks to help them use technology for supporting students' deep thinking about content?

    Do you think Edutopia would count as an OER? They've got tons of videos and resources for teachers, and a lot of it focuses on technology integration. Teachingchannel.org also has lots of lesson plans and things. Neither of those are really geared toward student use, but I'm pretty sure they're open source, and they support learning. I know there are also some great Weebly sites to help teachers and students access and work with knowledge, but those are usually set up by individual teachers or schools.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I agree that the TPACK and CLF frameworks can be overwhelming. I do like how this chapter made them seem less daunting, though, and more of a way for students to show learning and connect to other resources and peers. I like how she also included standards that already mention technology use as well. What I noticed was that the reading standards listed are asking students to analyze digital sources and text for meaning, clarification and credibility. This makes the TPACK framework and integration of technology into the curriculum and lessons less daunting for me.

    ReplyDelete
  4. 1. I do agree that sometimes technology can be a babysitter, which I know has a bad context, but I do think it can still be educational! Especially for the students who are difficult to keep still or keep occupied, why not let them listen to a book on an iPad or play a word game? Just because it is keeping the students busy does not mean that it has to be a waste of time. This is a reason why it is important that the kiddos understand the rules for using technology. It is a privilege and they should know what apps and programs they are allowed to use.

    2, Oh my gosh, thank you for the suggestions of Ticket to Read and Epic! Wow! I actually have never heard of TPACK until this week! Learning a lot!

    3. Absolutely!!! My motto that I got from one of my upgrade professors is "If it is already there, why do the work to remake it?". As teachers we will drive ourselves crazy if we do everything ourselves. We need to rely on each other not only for ideas but also for support. This is a hard profession we are in and we need all the help we can get it. I have used Teachers Pay Teachers before and Pinterest. Also, a general Google search can sometimes bring up great info that can be helpful for lessons! :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I know that Pinterest and Google are not specific OERs, but they are examples of helpful educational resources that are open to the public!

      Delete